Medical Evidence AI organises oncology case information and scientific references for professional discussion. This page explains what the system does and what the treating team must verify.
The professional account records diagnosis, course, prior treatments, pathology, biomarkers, imaging and, when available, laboratory, immune-profile and CTC data. Medical documents cannot be uploaded in the current release.
Direct identifiers must not be entered. Free text can still contain identifying details, so the professional must review it before submission.
The report separates recorded findings, interpretation, open questions and missing information. It can present options for professional discussion, Evidence Matches, diagnostic gaps and potentially relevant clinical trials.
A match describes possible overlap between a case and a study population. It does not establish individual benefit or trial eligibility.
Reports can include title, year, source type, population, key finding, applicability, limitations and a source link. In this release, source details and links are not guaranteed by an independent automated verification process.
Before clinical use, the professional must check the original source, guideline version, approval information and current trial status. Research freshness also depends on which retrieval features are enabled for the installation.
The report’s “evidence level” field is a structured text description; it is not an independently validated or certified evidence-grading system. It should not be treated as a formal clinical quality score.
Outputs can be incomplete or incorrect. Each generated report is not automatically approved by a physician. Clinical Review Required: the responsible healthcare professional must review the report before use.
The AI request uses a defined list of clinical fields; account data, case reference, file names and storage paths are excluded. File uploads are disabled. Case information still needs to be pseudonymised before submission.
Case analysis remains technically blocked until the server and privacy approvals described in the privacy notice are confirmed. That notice describes processing, storage and data-subject rights.
The report is not a diagnosis, prescription, treatment directive or promise of care. It does not replace guideline review, a tumour board, clinical judgment or discussion with the patient.
Dendritic cell therapy is assessed by the same standard as other options and is included only where there is a case-specific scientific or clinical rationale.
